To be known first: in a safety communication published in 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that it has not approved the safety and effectiveness of energy-based devices (laser and radiofrequency) for "vaginal rejuvenation" or for cosmetic use. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has also published an opinion stating that cosmetic vaginal procedures are not medically necessary and are not based on adequate evidence. The information on this page does not mean that the method is a proven treatment.
What is the state of the evidence?
The picture has two sides; this is the most important section of the page.
- On the favourable side: in a multicentre study in which participants were divided into random groups and one group was treated with the device in its inactive state, significant improvement in vaginal laxity and sexual function scores was reported in those who received radiofrequency compared with the comparison group. Safety and short- to medium-term results appear favourable in these studies.
- On the unfavourable side: international specialist societies state that broader, longer-term and double-blind studies are needed before the method can be considered a standard first-line treatment. Long-term data are not yet sufficient.
These two pieces of information must be read together. The method may have a place, but it would not be right to describe it as a proven treatment.
What is radiofrequency and what does it do in the tissue?
Radiofrequency is a non-ionising electromagnetic current. When the current meets the resistance of the tissue it turns into heat and warms the tissue in a controlled way to about 40–45 degrees Celsius. This heat does two things:
- A tightening that is noticed after the procedure, through contraction of the collagen fibres.
- Over the following 3–4 months, the production of new collagen and elastin and new blood vessels, through stimulation of the cells that produce collagen (fibroblasts). Tissue samples have shown thickening of the surface layer of the vagina and enrichment of the collagen network.
How it differs from laser
- Tissue surface: the carbon dioxide laser produces controlled peeling (ablation) at the surface; radiofrequency does not peel the surface.
- Temperature and depth: the laser stays more superficial but reaches a higher temperature (60–65 degrees). Radiofrequency goes deeper and works at a lower temperature.
- Skin colour: the laser works depending on the tissue components that absorb light (chromophores), and therefore carries a risk of burns in darker skin types. Radiofrequency, on the other hand, is not absorbed by melanin.
- Recovery: after laser a period of abstaining from intercourse is usually asked for; after radiofrequency no such restriction has been reported, because no wound forms at the surface.
For which complaints does it come up?
- Vaginal laxity — loss of elasticity with childbirth or ageing.
- Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) — vaginal dryness, burning and pain during intercourse. It is mentioned as one of the options particularly where the use of local oestrogen is inadvisable (for example a history of breast cancer).
- Mild urinary incontinence and mild prolapse — leakage at moments such as coughing or sneezing, and first- or second-degree prolapse.
- Laxity of the outer lips — for non-surgical tightening.
- Some skin problems such as lichen sclerosus — to relieve complaints in patients who cannot use oestrogen.
For each of these headings there are treatments with stronger evidence that come first. For example, local oestrogen comes first in GSM and pelvic floor exercises in urinary incontinence. Radiofrequency comes up not instead of these, but only where it is considered suitable.
How is the procedure carried out?
- It is a day procedure carried out in the outpatient setting; it has been reported that no anaesthesia is required.
- Application inside the vagina takes about 20 minutes, and application to the outer area about 10 minutes.
- The number of sessions varies with the device used: in some systems three sessions 4–6 weeks apart are recommended, while in others a single session is applied. It has been reported that a repeat once a year is recommended in order to maintain what has been gained.
- The main part of the effect is not seen immediately: it begins to be felt after the third week and continues to develop over 3–4 months.
Who is it not performed on?
- Those with a pacemaker or an implanted electronic device — it is not applied, because the device produces an electromagnetic current.
- Pregnancy and the first three months after birth.
- Active infection — while there is vaginitis, urinary tract infection, thrush, a genital wart or a herpes lesion.
- During menstrual bleeding.
- Those with an abnormal smear result, or without a clear result within the past year.
- Those with cancer of the genital area, or a suspicious tissue change (lesion) that has not been diagnosed.
- Second-degree prolapse and above — in this situation the method is inadequate; surgical repair is recommended.
- Those with unrealistic expectations, and mental health conditions that need assessment.
Using an intrauterine device (coil) is not an obstacle to this procedure; it has been reported that it does not need to be removed beforehand.
Known side effects
- Temporary and mild ones: redness (erythema) in the treated area, tenderness, mild oedema (swelling) and tingling.
- Blistering: if the application is continued for longer than needed, small blisters may form at the entrance to the vagina; they settle within a few days.
- Heat burn: when the energy is delivered without control, or when the device's return plate that touches the body does not sit fully on the skin, burns going as far as third degree have been reported. This risk increases when the patient is under anaesthesia for another operation and cannot feel the pain.
- Tissue loss: although very rare, the development of scarring and wasting (atrophy) of the fat tissue under the skin has been reported.
- Change in sensation: rarely, temporary numbness or, on the contrary, excessive sensitivity may be seen.
When you decide: this is not a necessity but a procedure that is chosen. Before deciding, the cause of the complaint needs to be established, the options with stronger evidence need to be discussed, and the risks above need to be known.
With any surgical procedure, results vary from person to person. You are advised to discuss the procedure with your doctor in detail beforehand.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is genital radiofrequency a proven treatment?
No. In 2018 the FDA announced that it had not approved the safety and effectiveness of energy-based devices for this purpose; ACOG also stated that cosmetic vaginal procedures are not based on adequate evidence. There are studies reporting favourable results, but specialist societies say broader and longer-term studies are needed.
Radiofrequency or laser?
The two work differently. The laser produces controlled peeling at the tissue surface, reaches a higher temperature, and because it depends on the tissue components that absorb light it carries a risk of burns in darker skin types. Radiofrequency does not peel the surface, goes deeper and works at a lower temperature. Which is suitable depends on the complaint, the state of the tissue and the person's other health problems; the evidence for both is limited in a similar way.
How many sessions are needed and when is the effect seen?
The number of sessions varies with the device used: in some systems three sessions 4–6 weeks apart, in others a single session. The main part of the effect does not appear immediately; it begins to be felt after the third week and continues to develop over 3–4 months.
Can it be done if I have a pacemaker?
No. Because the device produces an electromagnetic current, it is not applied to those with a pacemaker or another implanted electronic device. An intrauterine device (coil), on the other hand, is not an obstacle; it does not need to be removed.
I have urinary incontinence — can I go straight to this method?
The type and degree of the leakage need to be established first. Pelvic floor exercises, for which the evidence is stronger, come first. Radiofrequency may come up only in mild cases and after the other options have been assessed; in second-degree prolapse and above it is inadequate, and in that situation surgical repair is recommended.
Sources
- Eserdağ S — Aesthetic and Functional Female Genital Surgery, Chapter 16 (Transcutaneous Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency) and Chapter 18 (Genital Radiofrequency). The working principle of radiofrequency, comparison with laser, application protocol, situations in which it should not be used, and side effects.
- Vaghasia J — Radiofrequency in Aesthetic Gynecology, Chapter 7. Changes at tissue level, collagen and elastin production, areas of use and complications.
- Jindal P, Malhotra N — Aesthetic & Regenerative Gynecology, Chapters 2, 6 and 7. The situations in which it is used, the period after the procedure and the regulators' warnings.
- Bader A (Ed.) — Aesthetic Gynecology Rejuvenation. Skin type and independence from the chromophore.
- Alinsod R — Transcutaneous Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency. Use in urinary incontinence and mild prolapse, session protocol.
- Hamori C — Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery, Chapters 10 and 16. Changes in sensation and complications.
- US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — safety communication dated 30 July 2018 and updated in November 2018: energy-based devices have not been approved for "vaginal rejuvenation".
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) — Committee Opinion No. 795, cosmetic vaginal procedures.
The information on this page is based on the national and international guidelines listed above. The page is reviewed whenever those guidelines are updated.
Practice and Contact Details
The information on this page is general. Please speak to your doctor about your own situation.
- DoctorOp. Dr. Murat Alpay — Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- AddressOp. Dr. Murat Alpay Practice, Tekelioğlu Cd. No:51 B Kat:2, Filo Apt., 07160 Muratpaşa / Antalya
- Telephone0505 351 77 88
- HoursMonday – Saturday 09:00 – 18:00 · Closed on Sunday